Kommetjie Canine College

Kommetjie Canine College A training school for dogs of all ages: from puppy socialisation classes to Advanced Trick Training

I have always thought that balanced trainers have to lack something in logic, reasoning and emotional intelligence to be...
21/04/2026

I have always thought that balanced trainers have to lack something in logic, reasoning and emotional intelligence to believe that dogs need to be hurt or frightened to learn or, equally bizarrely, that using force, pain and intimidation doesn’t really hurt or frighten dogs. But the latest attack they have launched on positive reinforcement training or, rather positive reinforcement trainers, is beyond anything I thought even they were capable of in its complete logic failure and viciousness.

I am referring to the current slew of posts on social media claiming that well-known trainer Denise Fenzi caused the death of her dog Ice, because she refused to give him a good correction or use a shock collar on him. Ice tragically died from heat stroke when the climate control system in Denise’s car failed while he was in it. This happened last September, but for some reason, the balanced training community has latched on to this horrific event as an excuse to shout their usual “force free trainers kill dogs” mantra at the top of their lungs many months later.

Aside from what it says about a person’s character to use someone else’s personal tragedy as a means to publicly attack them, the twisted reasoning they employ to do this, is insane. These trainers are claiming that the dog would not have been in the car, if he had been trained with aversives. They are claiming that he was put in the car as a “time-out” and that if he was punished with an aversive, the time out would not have been necessary and he would not have died.

Where does one even begin:
Firstly, there is no evidence that in this case the dog was placed in the car as a training measure. None whatsoever. He was not the only dog in the car, so why it is assumed that this had anything to do with training at all is truly bizarre.
Secondly, time outs are not a “popular tool of positive reinforcement trainers”. Denise Fenzi may have used them in certain circumstances (not in this case), but many “force free” trainers like myself would give you 10 reasons why we don’t use time-outs: the main one being because we aren’t great proponents of negative punishment, due to the frustration that it tends to cause and it’s ineffectiveness to teach anything. To say that not utilising shock collars automatically means you have to utilise time-outs is just stupid.
Thirdly, are balanced trainers honestly claiming that they never use negative punishment? I seriously doubt that. I have seen plenty of balanced trainers deny their dogs all sorts of things in the name of “training”, including forcing them to spend 80% of their lives confined in a crate. Let’s not even start to look at all their vehicles kitted out with cages for their dogs to stay in for hours while they are at sporting events etc. To imply that only force free trainers leave their dogs in their cars is just ludicrous.

Honestly, I can’t believe that I am actually having to state this stuff, it is just so blatantly and ridiculously stupid. But this is so appalling that I really cannot keep quiet.

I am not a follower of Denise Fenzi and I don’t agree with some of what she has written as a dog trainer. I am more interested in dog welfare and healthy dog-human relationships than dog sports and I am more interested in emotional wellbeing than training for performance. I don’t leave my dogs in my car other than for a brief few minutes or if I am waiting in the car with them or literally standing right there with the windows open. I can’t say I would be comfortable relying on technology to keep my dogs safe, but then I am probably a bit paranoid and am always imagining worst case scenarios and that’s not necessarily healthy either (I haven’t been on holiday without my dogs for years because I don’t even trust any human to look after my dogs). But it is unfathomable to me to use what was clearly a tragic accident to attack another trainer, who would never have intended harm to come to her dogs in a million years and who trusted that her dogs would be safe. To use a devastating loss to score points over training methods is just beyond the pale. I cannot actually find the words to express how despicable I find it. All this latest episode has proven to me is how mentally and emotionally deficient many balanced trainers are and reaffirmed that it is not a world that I will ever want anything to do with.

It’s nearly here! Time is running out to register for the upcoming summit, Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit - Apr...
15/04/2026

It’s nearly here! Time is running out to register for the upcoming summit, Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit - April 2026.

Get access to more than 12 hours of educational information and actionable tips to help your dog stay calm and anxiety free when faced with their triggers.

My friend Ness Jones has brought together more than 10 world-class speakers on aggression & reactivity in our canine companions and how to resolve it.

Yes, this is a paid product but is well worth the $47 US price tag for the more than 15 hours of education information and actionable tips you will receive.

The2026 Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit will be released on April 19 (northern hemisphere) & April 20 (southern hemisphere) and then you’ll gain access to expert speakers from around the world as well as the free gifts they are providing you!

These speakers have so much wonderful knowledge to share.

Topics include:

🐾 Dog-Dog AggressionPaw prints with solid fillPaw prints with solid fill

🐾 Chronic Stress & ReactivityPaw prints with solid fill

🐾 Rehabilitating Reactive Behaviour

🐾 Why You Can’t Train Through PanicPaw prints with solid fillPaw prints with solid fill

🐾 Dogs Who Aren’t Food MotivatedPaw prints with solid fill

🐾 How Maternal Stress Impacts Canine BehaviourPaw prints with solid fill

🐾 Why Some Dogs Connect and others React

and so much more …

Click below to register https://www.decodingyourcanine.com/courses/aggression26/?affiliate=CGNKQO

Do you want to learn more about reactivity and aggression? Do you want to understand why your dog might not be coping wi...
15/04/2026

Do you want to learn more about reactivity and aggression? Do you want to understand why your dog might not be coping with certain triggers and find out how you can help them?

Then you should sign up for the 2026 Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit.

My friend Ness Jones has invited more than 10 behaviour professionals, including me, from around the world to help you to understand and resolve issues around aggression and reactivity.

And you can get access to all of it by clicking HERE https://www.decodingyourcanine.com/courses/aggression26/?affiliate=CGNKQO

This summit will be released on April 19 (northern hemisphere) or April 20 (southern hemisphere) and then you’ll gain access to expert speakers from around the world.
Yes, this is a paid product but is well worth the $47 US price tag for the more than 12 hours of education information and actionable tips you will receive and which you will have lifetime access to.

Claim your ticket to the online event https://www.decodingyourcanine.com/courses/aggression26/?affiliate=CGNKQO

I’m very excited to have been asked to speak at the upcoming Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit - April 2026.My fri...
08/04/2026

I’m very excited to have been asked to speak at the upcoming Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit - April 2026.

My friend Ness Jones has brought together 10+ top experts and specialists with literally hours and hours of educational information and actionable tips on supporting your dog to work through their aggression or reactivity.

Yes, this is a paid product but is well worth the $47 US price tag for the more than 15 hours of education information and actionable tips you will receive.

The 2026 Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit will be released on April 19/20 (depending where you are located) and then you’ll gain lifetime access to expert speakers from around the world so you can go back and revisit the material whenever you wish!

Click the link to sign up:

https://www.decodingyourcanine.com/courses/aggression26/?affiliate=CGNKQO

Is it possible to teach your reactive dog to be calm and composed around its trigger?Do you want to know how? Then you s...
01/04/2026

Is it possible to teach your reactive dog to be calm and composed around its trigger?

Do you want to know how? Then you should sign up for the 2026 Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit.

My friend Ness Jones has put together an amazing summit of more than 15 top professionals, myself included, from around the world to help you resolve this anxiety inducing problem.

Yes, this is a paid product but is well worth the $47 US price tag for the more than 15 hours of education information and actionable tips you will receive.

The 2026 Decoding Aggression & Reactivity Summit will be released on April 19 (UK/Europe) & April 20 (Australia/South Africa) and then you’ll gain access to expert speakers from around the world.

You will also hear me talking about one of my favourite things, "The Right Dog for the Right Environment – Understanding who our dogs are and how to fulfil their needs".

Your tribe is waiting -sign up at the following link: https://www.decodingyourcanine.com/courses/aggression26/?affiliate=CGNKQO

There are a lot of things that trouble me about the behaviour of many dog guardians in the way that they treat their dog...
18/03/2026

There are a lot of things that trouble me about the behaviour of many dog guardians in the way that they treat their dogs and how they treat others around them in relation to their dogs. There is one thing though, that speaks to a level of pride, arrogance and entitlement like nothing else:

Taking your dog out in public with no leash, collar, harness or any possible means of restraining them in an emergency.

This is not a post in favour of keeping dogs on lead all the time. I strongly believe that all dogs who are well-socialised, tolerant and trained to respond to their guardians when out and about, should be given off-lead time in appropriate areas. This post is aimed at the totally irresponsible action of taking a dog out in public, with no collar, no harness and no lead available to put on the dog, if something happens and the dog needs to be restrained.

This morning, I took Ozzy to a local common, so that he could have a social outing in a popular dog walking area. I allowed him off lead for much of the time, as he sticks close to me, but he was wearing his collar (with identification) and a harness which I could grab easily in an emergency. I carried his lead in my hand and a couple of times I clipped it on when I thought he might be tempted to follow someone else or I wanted to avoid a particular situation.

It wasn’t too long before I spotted a woman with two pit bulls coming up behind me talking on her cell phone. Neither of the dogs had a collar or harness. The woman was not carrying leads. I could see the dogs showing a lot of interest in Ozzy, who was not aware of them. The dogs left the owner and ran up behind us. The female was okay and seemed to relax after sniffing Ozzy, who was polite and deferential towards her. However, the male snarled at Ozzy, who thank goodness used a lot of calming signals and moved away quickly. The woman strolled past still talking on the phone and the dogs carried on their way. I breathed a sigh of relief.

While there was no “incident” and we were both fine, I am left once again astounded by the stupidity and downright arrogance of dog guardians who don’t seem to think about the consequences of having nothing at all by which to grab hold of their dogs in an emergency. We may all trust our dogs and think they “would never….” (fill in the blank according to the situation), but dogs are animals, not robots and while past behaviour may be a good indicator of future behaviour, we never know what circumstances might arise to create an emergency where we need to be able to hang on to them. What if Ozzy had not been so deferential to these dogs? What if it had been a different dog going through the peak of adolescence and feeling full of nonsense with another male dog? What if it had been a nervous dog, who tried to get out of the situation by snapping at these dogs? What if these dogs were having a bad day and an encounter with a dog that didn’t like them triggered retaliation? What would that woman have done? How would she have gotten hold of her dogs? How would she have removed them from another dog?

What if the horses that are brought to graze on the common had arrived while she was walking? What if the horses were a bit “fresh” when coming onto the common (they pretty much always are) - What would she have done?

I know what I would have done if I saw the horses arriving: I would have immediately put my dog on his lead and kept him on the lead until everything had settled. This even though Ozzy has walked with my own horse and is perfectly relaxed with him – it is the common sense, responsible and safe thing to do.

It is the same reason I have never walked a dog of mine off lead on a road EVER. Despite all their training qualifications or how responsive they might have generally been once mature adults. It is not worth the risk. ANYTHING can happen. I would never forgive myself if my pride and arrogance in my capabilities to train and control my dogs led to them getting knocked over or killed. And it has happened to so many people in my own neighbourhood, where there is a very lax attitude to this sort of thing.

I don’t care how much you trust your dog. You are not the only ones in the environment. You do not know what another dog might do. You don’t know what another person might do. You have no idea what wildlife could do.

By all means, train and socialise your dogs so that they can enjoy some freedom in off lead areas. Ideally, that is what we all want for our dogs. But for goodness sake, have something secure on your dog that you can grab, hold onto and attach a lead to in an emergency. Life happens. We need to stop living in la-la land thinking that it will never happen to us or our dogs. Be prepared. Be responsible and ALWAYS have a means to grab, hold and put your dog on lead if you need to. You are not special.

Our newest family member is 16 weeks old tomorrow. We will have had Ozzy for 8 weeks this coming Monday, which will mean...
13/02/2026

Our newest family member is 16 weeks old tomorrow. We will have had Ozzy for 8 weeks this coming Monday, which will mean that he has spent half his little life with his breeder and canine family and half with us. We were lucky that his breeder gave a huge amount of input into the puppies, building their confidence and problem-solving skills and ensuring that all the pups had the best start to life possible.

But all I keep thinking about is how fast this time is going and how quickly Ozzy is growing and developing. Two of his siblings have lost a couple of baby teeth already and Ozzy is entering that phase where he is all legs and ears.

While Rottweilers develop slowly, so their socialisation window is on the longer end of the spectrum in comparison to more “mature” breeds, I can’t help but feel that the puppy phase is slipping away and wondering if I have done enough with regards to positive exposure to the outside world, to people, dogs and new experiences. This time is so precious, and puppies are generally so easy to introduce to new things at this stage, that I don’t want to have wasted a second, yet I also need to balance exposure with safety, security and rest.

I am sure that I don’t get everything right and also know that some things are out of my control, yet the past 8 weeks have pretty much revolved around meeting Ozzy’s needs and providing as many positive social experiences as possible. While this is all at the forefront of my mind, I can’t help but think of how many people contact me to inquire about puppy classes when their pups are 4, 5 or 6 months of age (basically when they are beyond the socialisation period and the age for puppy class) and how commonly they answer the intake question “How often do you take your puppy for outings or a walk” with “Not yet, too young” or “Not until all vaccinations are done”.

I really want to weep when I read this. It astounds me that with so much information available today, people still think it is okay to isolate a puppy during the socialisation period. This period is such a short time in your dog’s life, but what you do with it will have deep and lasting impact for the rest of the life you share together. I have said it before, but I will say it again: socialisation cannot wait until you are less busy, until your visitors leave, until you are back from holiday, until better weather, until your children have less extramural activities or indeed until your puppy has had all their vaccinations. Time does not stand still, and your puppy will keep growing and changing by the day, regardless of whether you are ready or not. Before you know it, they will not be a puppy any longer, but a teenager and then a young adult. Trying to make up for deficits in socialisation at that stage is incredibly difficult. If you didn’t have time to expose them to the world when it was easy, you definitely won’t have time for the harder work required for careful remedial socialisation.

While I think of all the places Ozzy has been to, the puppy classes he has attended, the friends he has made, the dogs and people he has met and the good experiences he has had and I wonder if it is enough, it is sad to remember that so many puppies his age have known nothing but their own home. They are missing out on so much and their families are missing out on a time and opportunity they will never get back.

I truly wonder if this will ever change?

With the latest pit-bull related fatality in Cape Town, I have been contacted by numerous people asking for my thoughts ...
11/02/2026

With the latest pit-bull related fatality in Cape Town, I have been contacted by numerous people asking for my thoughts about various statements and posts on the subject. I have written a few articles about Pit Bulls over the last 10 years, including an educational article that I wrote for the Pit Bull Federation last year. However, I wanted to add a few things in light of what has been said by various organizations and parties about this specific incident and the giant elephant in the room which I feel is ignored time and again in an attempt to excuse attacks of this nature.

It seems that a relative of the deceased has commented on social media alleging that the dogs in this case were badly treated and encouraged to be human aggressive. As a result of this a huge emphasis has been placed on the responsibility of the owner/s for what happened and much said about how this is a case of a problem owner and not a problem dog.

While it is inexcusable for any dog to be neglected, abused or incited to be aggressive, the sad reality is that a huge number of dogs are treated appallingly in this country (and around the world), but that they do not maul or kill people as a result. There is one specific type of dog that is responsible for most fatal dog attacks. No other breed or type comes even close. Pit Bull type dogs are estimated to be responsible for at least 66-70% of human fatalities – this means they are twice as likely to kill someone as every other type of dog on the planet added together and at least 6 - 7 times more likely than any other breed recorded in human fatalities, despite the fact that they only account for about 6-10% of the dog population worldwide. Those figures are staggering.

But I can already hear the next argument: How do you know these dogs are actually pit bulls? Did you test them genetically? These dogs are not registered American Pit Bull Terriers (APBT)?

There is a lot of debate about what a pit bull is. Enthusiasts of the APBT will claim that only dogs registered as such are true pit bulls and that all other dogs are mixed breeds that simply look a bit like pit bulls but could be made up of many other breeds. The rationale is that it is these mixed breeds that kill people and not real pit bull terriers.

But here’s the thing, like most other types/breeds of dogs we have today, “Pit Bulls” were genetically selected for a specific form and function. They were “designed” to attack bulls and hold onto their faces, often resulting in the bull’s death. They were then used for dog fighting: grabbing, shaking, ripping and killing another large animal. Initially it was this behavioural ability that was selected for, and as we understand from the evolutionary process of “natural selection”, form follows function: if you select for a particular behaviour or ability, a form that supports that behaviour and ability will start to emerge. Later, there would have been more specific selection for particular physical traits and finally a “breed standard” amongst registered dogs, but the evolution of this dog (like most other breeds) was based on their ability and not a strict set of aesthetic norms.

A good breed to help understand this concept is the border collie. Sheep farmers didn’t wake up one day and decide to design an agile, slim, black and white dog, with pricked, but floppy-tipped ears and a white tipped tail of medium size and mid-length hair. They simply selected dogs that had a propensity for rehearsing “EYE-STALK-CHASE” behaviours relentlessly, because this behaviour pattern worked like a charm to move and control herds of sheep. But again, with continuous selection pressure for specific behaviour characteristics, similar physical characteristics emerged and we ended up with a dog that one would call a “border collie” today. Border collies have been around for well over a century, but do you know when the border collie was registered as a breed in South Africa? Only in 1980. Most “border collies” in this country are not registered with the Kennel Union. Most are working dogs who may or may not be registered with the South African Sheepdog Association. These dogs do not have to conform to a strict set of physical criteria – they are working dogs and it is their ability, not their precise conformation, that is important. As a result, while all border collies have general physical and behavioural characteristics that make them clearly recognizable, there is also much variation in size, coat colour, ear carriage and coat length. However, would anyone truly argue that they are not all border collies? Of course not.

Yet this is exactly what people are arguing about Pit Bulls. We need to understand that apart from the minute gene pool of registered APBT’s, the majority of “Pit Bulls” are dogs who have been selected for a function and a form which supports that function. They are a specific type of dog selected to have a strong “GRAB-SHAKE-KILL” pattern of behaviour and a propensity to direct this behaviour towards large animals and other dogs. The blocky head, exaggerated musculature and general physical conformation that supports that function is what we now recognise as a “Pit Bull”. Most are not registered dogs. Most are a very obvious type of dog, rather than a tiny selection of specimens from a registered breed.

We cannot ignore the fact that it is not “Labrador type dogs” (or poodle types or German Shepherd types or insert any other breed) that are responsible for the majority of deaths by dog attack. It is not a figment of the imagination that by far, the majority of dogs involved in human fatalities look like Pit Bulls. Because they are indeed “Pit Bull type dogs” regardless of their exact pedigree or genetic lineage. They are a “type” that has been selected for a form and function – a function that sadly still goes on to this day (dog fighting is not a thing of the past).

The denial and the excuses have to stop. We have to face what this type of dog was designed to do and how that design has created an animal that presents a disproportionate risk to other dogs and yes, humans as well, because of the physical, behavioural and emotional characteristics we selected for. I am so tired of hearing that “Proper Pit Bulls” were selected to be totally non-aggressive towards people. This is not about sociability or tractability, it is about a lethal behaviour pattern being selected for in a dog with enormous strength – in the best circumstances this behaviour pattern will likely not be directed at a human being, but in less-than-ideal circumstances, the risk is real.

Many other terriers have the exact same behaviour pattern, but it is focused on small animals and they do not generally have the ability to inflict severe damage on other dogs and people. Other breeds may weigh more than pit bulls and have bigger teeth and stronger jaws, but on the other hand they DO NOT have the exaggerated “GRAB-SHAKE-KILL” motor pattern and as a result, it is far rarer for them to end up killing people. This is not a “Power Breed” problem. It is a pit bull problem – it is the precisely chosen behavioural AND physical characteristics that create the risk with these dogs. This was our design and now we live with the consequences.

Yes, responsible dog ownership is something that needs to be encouraged. Absolutely, abuse, neglect and bad training and handling practices must be called out and even prosecuted. But this doesn’t change the fact that regardless of their circumstances, all dogs simply do not pose the same level of risk. People are fond of quoting statistics about dog bites which indicate that more people are bitten by Labradors and small breed dogs than pit bulls. Yes, they are. But there is a HUGE difference between a dog bite and a dog fatality or near fatality. ALL dogs can use aggression if the need arises and all dogs are capable of biting, but all dogs do NOT kill people on a regular basis when they do so. It is completely disingenuous to compare a nip or single bite and release with mauling and killing.

And please, we have to stop romanticising these dogs. Even well-meaning rhetoric that cautions about the reality of owning a pit bull often ends with statements about how “incredible”, “phenomenal” or “amazing” the breed is IF you are the unicorn owner responsible enough to have one. Please understand – everyone thinks they are special – especially the most out of touch with reality. This “they are awesome, but you have to be a special person to have one” actually attracts the worst in dog guardians. People who overestimate their ability and underestimate the risk.

Things are not getting better. These dogs are only becoming more popular. The message has to change.

Our first Puppy Class intake for 2026 is on the 24th January. Pups must be UNDER 18 WEEKS at the start of the course and...
21/01/2026

Our first Puppy Class intake for 2026 is on the 24th January. Pups must be UNDER 18 WEEKS at the start of the course and may begin from 10 weeks. This is the most crucial time for socialisation, so please don't leave it until it is too late 🐾
Puppy classes are lots of fun and a great opportunity to learn and bond with your puppy.
For details please email [email protected]

Address

Kommetjie
Cape Town
7975

Opening Hours

Monday 08:30 - 17:00
Tuesday 08:30 - 17:00
Wednesday 08:30 - 17:00
Friday 08:30 - 17:00
Saturday 08:30 - 17:00

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kommetjie Canine College posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Kommetjie Canine College:

Share

Category