Green Wolf Farm

Green Wolf Farm Former family farm now providing a safe, forever home and sanctuary for rescued northern mixed breed

All natural specialized horse boarding utilizing a track system (Paddock Paradise) and feed stations spread along varied terrain to encourage constant movement and natural herd behavior and interaction.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18p9cymbcV/
06/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18p9cymbcV/

In 1988, a hiker walked up to a ranger at Big Bend National Park and said he had seen black bears in the Chisos Mountains. The ranger told him he had probably seen javelinas. The hiker said he had taken photographs. He mailed a slide to the park. It landed on the desk of wildlife biologist Raymond Skiles.

It was a female black bear with cubs.

Skiles called it the eureka moment. Black bears had been gone from Big Bend and the rest of West Texas for roughly forty years. By the time the park was established in 1944, shooting, trapping, federal predator control, and settlement had wiped them out of the Chisos Mountains and every other range in the region. In 1901, biologist Vernon Bailey had described bears as common in the upper canyons of the Chisos, with fresh tracks of old and young frequently seen and an abundance of old sign and turned-over stones.

Forty-three years later, the park opened with no bears.
Scattered sightings trickled in over the following decades. In 1969 and again in 1978, female bears with cubs were seen in the Chisos. Individual animals wandered in from Mexico and wandered back. But nobody considered the bears resident. They were ghosts passing through a former range that had the habitat but not the population.

Then the photograph arrived.

Genetic testing by researcher Dave Onorato confirmed what the slide showed. Sometime during the 1980s, one or more bears, including at least one female, had crossed from the Sierra del Carmen in northern Mexico into the Chisos Mountains and stayed. The Sierra del Carmen is a rugged limestone range rising above the Rio Grande on the Mexican side of the border. Mexico listed the black bear as endangered in 1985 and closed the hunting season.

Texas followed in 1986. The bears that had survived in the remote Mexican sierras while their relatives were being exterminated north of the river now had legal protection on both sides of the border.
The crossing itself is the part that makes biologists pause.

Between the Sierra del Carmen and the Chisos Mountains lies open Chihuahuan Desert. Miles of it. Flat, exposed, waterless terrain with no tree cover and daytime temperatures that can exceed 110 degrees. A black bear crossing that gap is walking through country that offers no shade, no food, no water, and no hiding from anything that might be watching. The bear has to descend from the Sierra del Carmen, cross the desert, swim the Rio Grande, cross more desert on the American side, and climb into the Chisos. The NPS page describes the journey plainly.

She descended from the mountains, crossed miles of desert, swam across the Rio Grande, and traversed more desert to reach the forested slopes of the Chisos Mountains.

She did it because the mountains were there and something in her biology told her they were usable. A black bear does not read a map. It does not know the Chisos Mountains held bears before it was born. It follows terrain, water, and elevation. A sky island rising out of the desert floor with pine, oak, juniper, madrone, and seasonal water is visible from the Sierra del Carmen on a clear day. The bear saw a mountain and walked to it.

By early 2000, the park estimated at least thirty black bears were living permanently in the Chisos. Females were denning. Cubs were being born in the park. The natural recolonization of historic habitat was described by the NPS as one of the major events of the park's fifty-five-year history. Once a large animal is eliminated from its natural range, the NPS wrote, it is rare for it to return on its own. Often, only human intervention can bring back what humans caused to disappear.

The bears came back without human intervention. Nobody trucked them in. Nobody flew them by helicopter. Nobody built a captive herd and staged a release. The Sierra del Carmen held the source population. The Rio Grande was crossable. The desert between the mountains was survivable. The Chisos still had the food, the water, and the denning habitat that had supported bears before the settlers killed them. Every link in the chain held, and the bears walked through it.

Then the drought hit.

In the summer and fall of 2000, Big Bend experienced severe drought. The seasonal food sources that bears depend on, primarily acorns, piƱon nuts, madrone berries, and sotol, failed across the Chisos. NPS researchers documented a remarkable migration of bears out of the park and back into Mexico. The animals that had spent a decade recolonizing their historic range reversed course and walked back across the desert to the Sierra del Carmen where the food was better. Skiles and Onorato watched the GPS data and the sighting reports and could not say whether the bears would return.

Some did. The population recovered after the drought broke, and by the 2010s bears were expanding beyond the park. Females with cubs were spotted north of Big Bend near the town of Alpine and in the Davis Mountains, the largest mountain range in Texas. The Chisos had become what Skiles always believed it could be, a natural steppingstone for the recolonization of the rest of West Texas.

Diana Doan-Crider, an adjunct professor at Texas A&M and executive director of a nonprofit called Animo Partnership in Natural Resources, spent years confirming the genetic link between the Big Bend bears and the Mexican source populations. Mexico has a thriving bear population, she said, thanks to its mountainous terrain and greater cultural acceptance of the animals. The recovery was possible because the bears had somewhere to come from, and that somewhere was Mexico.

The border wall debate added a layer that the original recolonization story did not have. A physical barrier along the Rio Grande through the Big Bend region would sever the corridor that the bears used to return. The female that crossed the desert and swam the river in the 1980s did it because there was nothing in her path except distance and heat. A concrete and steel wall in the river corridor would add a barrier that no black bear can climb, and the population that rebuilt itself through natural dispersal from Mexico would be cut off from the genetic source that made it possible.

As of the most recent surveys, roughly thirty to forty black bears occupy the Chisos Mountains and surrounding ranges. They are state-listed as threatened. They are still connected to Mexico by the same desert crossing their ancestors used. Whether that crossing stays open is not up to the bears. It is up to the people who decide what gets built along the river.

Source: National Park Service, Big Bend National Park / National Parks Conservation Association / Texas Parks and Wildlife Magazine / Earth Island Journal.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1Pt35zWnMx/
05/30/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1Pt35zWnMx/

The United States has killed roughly half a million coyotes per year for over a century. The coyote's range has expanded by forty percent in the same period.

That sentence contains the entire species in two lines. Every other predator in North America that faced sustained, federally funded lethal control was reduced or eliminated. The wolf was erased from the lower 48 by the 1930s. The grizzly was pushed into a handful of mountain strongholds. The mountain lion was driven out of the eastern two-thirds of the continent. The coyote absorbed the same pressure, the same traps, the same poison, the same aerial gunning, the same bounty systems, and responded by walking into every state the wolf had vacated, every city the mountain lion had abandoned, and every landscape that lethal control was supposed to clear.

Nobody planned this. The coyote was not reintroduced. It was not protected. It was not managed into recovery. It simply refused to be managed out of existence, and the biological machinery that made that possible is stranger than most people realize.
Start with the breeding. A coyote pair that mates in January or February will produce a litter of roughly six pups by April. If the local population is under heavy hunting or trapping pressure, litter sizes increase. Females in heavily persecuted populations produce more pups per litter than females in stable populations. The mechanism is not fully understood, but the effect is measurable and consistent. You kill more coyotes, and the survivors produce more coyotes. The population compensates for removal in real time.

Then there is the pair bond.

Stan Gehrt, a wildlife ecologist at Ohio State University, has been running the largest urban coyote study in history out of Chicago since the year 2000. Over six years, his team genetically sampled 236 coyotes across Cook, Kane, DuPage, and McHenry counties. They tested eighteen litters totaling ninety-six offspring. They were looking for evidence of infidelity, because every other supposedly monogamous canid species that had been genetically tested, including arctic foxes and mountain bluebirds, turned out to be cheating when the DNA was checked.

The coyotes were not cheating. Zero instances of polygamy. Zero instances of extra-pair paternity. Zero instances of a mate leaving while the other was still alive. One hundred percent genetic monogamy across the entire study population.
Gehrt said he was shocked. The Chicago metro area holds an estimated one to two thousand coyotes. Territories abut each other. Males make long-distance forays through other pairs' ranges. The opportunities to stray are constant. They do not take them. Pairs have been tracked staying together for up to ten years, separating only when one of them dies.

During estrus, a mated pair spends every hour together. Running, hunting, marking territory. Cecilia Hennessy, the study's senior author, described it simply. They will always be right at each other's side. The male practices what biologists call diligent mate guarding, staying close to the female and keeping rival males away. But the genetic data suggests the guarding is not even necessary. The females are not interested in other males either.

The payoff of that fidelity is paternal investment. A male coyote that knows every pup in the den is genetically his has a direct evolutionary stake in keeping them alive. He brings food. He defends the den. He teaches the pups to hunt. He spends as much time raising the litter as the female does. In a polygamous species, the male's genetic investment is spread across multiple litters by multiple females, and his per-litter commitment drops accordingly. In a monogamous species with verified genetic fidelity, every calorie the male brings to the den is going to his own offspring. The pair bond is not sentimental. It is the most efficient allocation of parental energy the species has found.

When a mate dies, the surviving coyote grieves. Gehrt documented the behavior across multiple observed deaths in the Chicago study. The surviving animal produces persistent, long howls that researchers describe as mournful. It shows lethargy. Its appetite drops. It returns to the spot where the partner was last seen. During one capture operation, Gehrt briefly sedated a female and took her into the lab for examination. Her mate, standing outside, howled nonstop until Gehrt brought her back. There was clearly a lot of emotional stuff going on with that animal, he said.

Only three to five percent of mammal species are monogamous by any definition. Genetically verified monogamy, where DNA testing confirms that neither partner ever breeds outside the pair, is rarer still. The coyote, the animal that most of North America treats as a pest to be shot on sight, practices a form of pair fidelity that is more absolute than wolves, more consistent than foxes, and more genetically verified than almost any wild carnivore ever studied.
The animal that we have spent a century trying to exterminate mates for life, raises its young cooperatively, grieves its dead, compensates for persecution by producing larger litters, and has responded to the most sustained predator-control campaign in the history of wildlife management by quietly colonizing every state in the continental United States.

We have posted about coyotes on this page before. The Florida Keys coyote. The Chicago parking garage coyote. Carl in Golden Gate Park. Hal in Central Park. Every one of those stories is a footnote in a larger pattern. The coyote is not surviving despite what humans do to it. It is surviving because nothing humans have done to it has been sufficient to outpace an animal that breeds fast, bonds absolutely, and replaces its losses before the next trapping season starts.

Source: Hennessy, C., Gehrt, S.D., et al. (2012). Journal of Mammalogy / Ohio State University / National Geographic, January 2026 / Cook County Coyote Project.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1DRuiJZ5EL/
05/12/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1DRuiJZ5EL/

A wild, 120-pound black-coated gray wolf walked out of the timber at Mendenhall Glacier, dropped into a play-bow in front of a domestic dog, and came back to do it again every day for six years.
The wolf showed up on the frozen edge of the glacier outside Juneau, Alaska in 2003. People walking their dogs on the ice near the lake noticed him first. A massive black wolf standing at the tree line, watching. Not stalking. Not circling. Standing still and watching the dogs.

The expected behavior in this situation is unambiguous. A wild wolf encountering a domestic dog treats it as a competitor. Wolves across North America routinely kill domestic dogs that enter their territory. The dog is a trespassing canid, and the wolf's response is hardwired. Chase it, catch it, kill it. It does not matter that they share a common ancestor. In the field, wolves and dogs are not family. They are rivals, and the wolf is bigger, faster, and built for killing in a way that no domestic breed can match.

This wolf did not follow the script. He stepped out of the tree line onto the ice, approached one of the dogs at a slow walk, lowered his front end to the ground with his hindquarters raised, and held a textbook play-bow. The universal canine invitation. The dog's owner stood frozen, watching a wild apex predator the size of a Great Dane ask a Labrador retriever to play.

The locals named him Romeo, and over the following weeks and months it became clear that the first encounter was not an anomaly. Romeo came back. He came back every day. He would emerge from the timber near the glacier, find the dogs being walked on the ice or along the trails, and initiate social contact. He wrestled with Labs and retrievers. He chased sticks. He bounded through the snow alongside dogs a fraction of his size.

Photographer Nick Jans, who lived near the glacier and spent years documenting Romeo's behavior, described watching the wolf carefully modulate his physical intensity around small dogs. Romeo understood his own size. A play bite from a 120-pound wolf could crush the skull of a pug, and Romeo seemed to know it. He adjusted. He held back. He played gently with small dogs and rougher with large ones, reading each animal individually and calibrating his response.

He never crossed the line into domestic dependency. He did not accept food from humans. He did not approach people for contact. He maintained a buffer of distance from the human beings attached to the dogs, tolerating their presence but not seeking it. His interest was specifically and exclusively in the dogs. He hunted his own food in the surrounding mountains and forest. He denned in the wild. He was not a habituated animal losing its fear of humans in exchange for easy calories. He was a fully wild wolf making a daily choice to walk out of the wilderness and socialize with domestic canids and then walk back into the timber when he was done.

The behavior sustained itself for six consecutive years. Romeo became the most famous wolf in Alaska and one of the most documented individual wolves in North American history. Jans eventually wrote a book about him. Biologists who observed the interactions struggled to explain them within the standard framework of wolf behavior. Lone wolves are not supposed to seek social bonds with dogs. They are supposed to seek other wolves, or failing that, endure solitude until they find a mate or a pack to join. Romeo appeared to have substituted domestic dogs for the social structure his biology demanded, and the substitution worked well enough that he maintained it across thousands of individual encounters over half a decade without a single aggressive incident.

Romeo was killed in 2009. Two men shot and trapped him illegally outside Juneau. They were eventually charged and convicted, but the wolf was gone. The frozen lake at Mendenhall lost the animal that had redefined what the community thought it understood about the boundary between wild and domestic, predator and companion, wolf and dog.

Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game / "A Wolf Called Romeo" Documentation

Image is for illustration purposes only

Address

Myrtle Creek, OR
97457

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Green Wolf Farm posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category