10/03/2026
This is completely unsurprising. Balanced/punitive trainers reject the large body of scientific research, veterinary behaviorists, universities, and zoos that advocate for force free training methodology for ALL training and behavioral issues.
Something I have noticed is that a lot of these people display insecurity in their speech and behavior and a need for control. Vulnerabilities like these (that could be exploited by ours or another intelligence agency) are something I pick up on quickly as a former CIA officer analyst. They appear focused on their ability to control another individual (at all costs) rather than looking at how to help the individual animal and their overall welfare. The satisfaction of coercing behavior from the animal strokes the ego of the individual rather than helping the animal. Big difference in approach and who is being helped in these opposite training scenarios. It sometimes feels like people like this are drawn to this field of work because there are no education requirements to open a business and make money, and it can also fulfill the needs of one's own ego. This is my own theory of why some people refuse to change even when they learn more -- it may no longer give them that sense of control through coercion. Just my thoughts as a former intelligence officer who was trained to identify these vulnerabilities. Obviously, not everyone who uses aversive fits into that mold, but some absolutely do. However, we all need to keep learning more and doing better, regardless of the methods we currently use and make it about the animal rather than oneself.
Dog Trainers Switch Methods Due to Empathy and Education | Psychology Today
Reward-based dog trainers place greater emphasis on education and science than those who use aversives, study shows.