01/13/2024
Here’s the thing about that recent video of Katie Prudent teaching a group of young riders: the way you react to the video tells me a lot about how you view the world.
Is it entirely possible to be very successful within your chosen sport/career while utilizing fear, punishment, and ego-driven, obedience-based methods? Absolutely. Many of the world’s top achievers in sport and business do this. It’s well known that psychopathy thrives in the executive branches across all different realms.
The question is not to do with Katie’s expertise within the field but the way in which she talks disparagingly about both horses and riders in this lesson. “Horses need a good licking” “I would flip him over backwards before letting him turn” etc. I won’t even get into the way she talked to the riders, because my expertise is with the horse side.
This tells me that her training methods are based in fear, and the thing about fear is that it only goes one way. Respect, on the other hand, in order to be real, has to go both ways. I don’t care if your relationship is within your species or inter-species, the knowledge of pain and punishment as the probable outcome to getting an answer wrong is not the way to build respect.
Kindness matters. It is also entirely possible to train horses with humility, care, and empathy, and achieve your riding and competitive goals at the same time. So why do we just say that the ends justify the means when it comes to high level professionals like this?
Anger is just ignorance in disguise, because something happened that makes you uncomfortable, and when you delve further into why it makes you feel that way, you’ll find the why. Why is my horse doing that? Why isn’t my horse doing this? Ripping his face off, or giving him a good licking prevents you from finding out the why, because you skipped that introspective moment of why it made you angry in the first place.
Why does the idea of another being “disobeying” make us so uncomfortable? Why do we require obedience at all times in the first place? Why do we think we inherently deserve it?
The perpetuation of this notion of “man’s dominion over beasts” with dominance and submission as the main tenets is absurd in this day and age. We have an explosion of science that proves horses to be far more intelligent, sensitive, and capable of complex emotions and feelings than we ever thought possible. Ignoring this is just intellectually lazy, and professionally embarrassing.