Mello-d Ranch Pet Boarding

04/24/2026

Andrew Evans, Superintendent 04-23-26 Bureau of Criminal Apprehension1
Minnesota Department of Public Safety Demand For A Criminal Investigation Into
Maryellen Suhrhoff
I believe that I have clear, precise and unquestionable evidence that Maryellen Suhrhoff has engaged in perjury,2 subornation of perjury, financial fraud,3 misuse of public resources, the unauthorized and illegal access4,5,6 of my private data (13.02 Subd. 12), and adding & abetting in criminal misconduct. See Exhibits A-I.
In late 2024 unbeknownst to me I made an agreement with a Jackson county employee by the name of Trudy Miller to board her brother-in-law John Miller’s dog, Bella. Please note that Bella was an elderly, female dog that would be classified by anyone familiar with dog care as a “hard keeper.” After both Trudy and her brother-in-law John failed to keep up their end of the contract I notified them that Bella would have to leave my care. Apparently both Trudy and John had an “axe to grind” with me over the contract that they failed to uphold. Soon after Bella’s departure from my care John sought out a quack who made some wild, outrageous and unsubstantiated claims of animal abuse. The quack’s wild, outrageous and unsubstan- tiated claims were not substantiated any objective7 blood analysis nor any urinalysis nor with even a pathologist’s report.
Trudy, the Jackson county employee, then filed a false police report against me with the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office. Instead of asking for an agency assist from an unbiased, outside law enforcement agency to investigate this false police report, Jackson County Sheriff Shawn Haken and Chief Deputy Kelly Mitchell plowed ahead in this conflict of interest. They plowed ahead by assigning this joke of a case to their laughable deputy, Jordan Behr. Behr suffers from a possibly incurable case of tunnel vision. Behr has more training in Portable Fire Extinguishers (8 classes) than he has in animal cruelty investigations (Zero classes). Once Behr obtained his predetermined conclusions he submitted this tainted material to Jackson County Attorney Kristi Meyeraan. Meyeraan knew or should have known it was a conflict of interest for Haken, Mitchell and Behr to investigate the false police report that was filed by Jackson county employee Trudy Miller. Instead of taking the evidence of this criminal misconduct/misuse of public resources by Haken, Mitchell, Behr and Miller to the County Commissioners, Meyeraan made the conscience decision involve Maryellen Suhrhoff in this ever-expanding conspiracy.
Suhrhoff then proceeded to illegally access (13.09(a)) both my private data (13.02 Subd. 12) and the confidential 13.82 subdivision criminal investigative data for my sham investigation. I know this to be true because it is a matter of the public record that Suhrhoff did not have a signed Appointment of Special Assistant Jackson County Attorney at the time she signed her sham complaint8,9 (32-CR-25-111) against me on 07-25-25. Plus, I have not given Suhrhoff my signed permission to access my private data (13.02 Subd. 12) that was in the possession of Jackson county. During the rigged hearing on 03-04-26 Suhrhoff admitted that the Appointment of Special Assistant Jackson County Attorney was a contract.10 Finally, Suhrhoff also admitted during the rigged hearing on 03-04-26 to not having a signed contract on 07-25- 25.
Without a signed contract Suhrhoff had no authority to access either my private data (13.02 Page 1 of x

Subd. 12) nor the confidential 13.82 subdivision criminal investigative data for my sham investigation. Then to compound Suhrhoff’s criminal acts Suhrhoff submitted a fraudulent bill to the county for her unauthorized work. According to the public data that I received from Jackson County Treasurer Kevin Nordquist, Suhrhoff submitted a bill for services rendered and that bill was paid by Jackson county. See Exhibits E-F. I contend that this is financial fraud.
In an attempt to cover up this financial fraud Suhrhoff and Meyeraan fabricated an Appointment of Special Assistant Jackson County Attorney on 12-11-25. See Exhibit I. I believe this constitutes misuse of Jackson County’s scant and valuable resources.
In their sworn probable cause statement for 32-CR-25-111 both Suhrhoff and Jackson County Chief Deputy Kelly Mitchell11 used lies of omission to hide the fact that Trudy Miller was actually a Jackson county employee. Suhrhoff kept this damning fact from me, my former defense attorney and from the court until the rigged 03-04-26 hearing. At the rigged 03-04-26 hearing Suhrhoff was forced to divulge on the record undeniable fact that Trudy Miller was a Jackson county employee. However, Suhrhoff made the wild, outrageous and unsubstantiated assertion that Trudy worked for County Attorney Meyeraan.12 This was the conflict of interest for Meyeraan. Of course, Suhrhoff intentionally forgot to mention during the hearing that it would also be a conflict for the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office. A conflict of interest for one is a conflict of interest for all!
In my Demand for Bentz’s Removal that was mailed to the Jackson District court on 01-22-26 via First Class US mail and a Form 3817 I provided clear, precise and unquestionable evidence that Trudy Miller was a Jackson County employee. However, my evidence was a public document that proved that Trudy worked for Jackson County Probation.13 In subsequent paperwork that I submitted to the court I provided public data that showed that Trudy worked for Angie Titus of Jackson County Family Services Network.
I allege that Suhrhoff’s use of lies of omission in her sworn statement in order to hide the fact that Trudy was a Jackson county employee constitutes perjury. I also alleged that Mitchell’s use of lies of omission in his probable cause statement is evidence that Suhrhoff suborned Mitchell’s perjured testimony.
I also have reason to suspect that Suhrhoff is advising both Haken and Mitchell to violate my rights in violation of 609.43(3) by telling them to not provide me with my 13.04 Subject data14 or my 13.03 public data. Willful refusal to provide the data is a violation of 609.43(1). See Exhibits A-D. Haken is still illegally withholding audio recorded conversations that Mitchell made with me in which he tired to steal money from me. Mitchell’s fraudulent scheme involved fraudulently charging me for “pages” of electronic data. That is not allowed pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Also being illegally withheld from me is Behr’s acknowledgment of his receipt of his copy of the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office policy and procedure manual.. I believe Suhrhoff’s motive for having Haken and Mitchell illegally withholding the data from me is that the data would undermine the credibility of both Mitchell and Behr.
Finally, I allege that the Jackson County Commissioners have aided and abetted in this cover- Page 2 of x

up. The Commissioners have received a signed copy of my Demand for Dismissal. The Demand for Dismissal outlined the criminal misconduct of Haken and Mitchell and the Commissioners willfully refused to take the information to their personnel committee and retain outside counsel to do an administrative investigation. They also willfully refused to contact an unbiased law enforcement agency with my signed complaint. Exhibit G is an email State Court Jeff Shorba & Exhibit H is an email to Assistant Chief Judge Troy Timmerman. Both emails include the email addresses of the Jackson County Commissioners. Both emails contain sufficient evidence for the Commissioners to logically conclude that the corrupt judges of Jackson County are misusing the space provided and funded by the county. And that misuse includes judges not protecting the rights of defendants and not forcing prosecutors or defense attorney to follow the law or the rules of court. Please note that I recorded conversations and text messages from the County Commissioners that substantiate my claims. The Jackson County Commissioners have a fiduciary responsibility to investigate misuse of Jackson county resources and refer them to the proper authorities. I allege that the Jackson county commissioner aiding and abetting in this cover-up with Suhrhoff, Meyeraan, Miller, Haken and Mitchell constitutes 375.182 Neglect Of Duty.15
I learned the hard way over the part year that neither the courts nor law enforcement16 in Minnesota can be trusted. So I am not holding my breath that you will do your advertised job! In my opinion you’re all criminals!
______________________________________________________________ Amy Allen Date:
72100 600th Avenue
Alpha, MN 56111
Mailed First Class USPS via Form 3817 to:
Andrew Evans 1430 Maryland Avenue East Saint Paul, Minnesota 55106 Jeff Shorba 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, St. Paul, MN 55155 Kayla McKinney, 405 Fourth Street Jackson, MN 56143
Julie Buntjer, P.O. Box 639 Worthington, Minnesota 56187
Kristi Meyeraan, Suite 2D 405 Fourth Street, Jackson, MN 56143

04/12/2026

sanctionable offense53,54 are occurring at your sham hearings. You don’t want it brought up on your weaponized record that the Jackson County Sheriff’s office (JCSO) policy and procedure manual is still being illegally withheld from me. Obviously the policy and procedure manual states that all laws must be followed and they can’t illegally withhold evidence from me.55
So your sham Contested Omnibus is going to be put on indefinite hold until I receive the JCSO policy and procedure manual, the audio recordings of your complainant Chief Deputy Kelly “Perjuring Thief” Mitchell trying to con me out of money for the JCSO policy and procedure manual. That is all part of my impeach evidence. Another piece of impeachment evidence is the work-related continuing education of the biased deputy Jordan “Tunnel vision” Behr. And last, but certainly not least, I want the evidence that your buddy Trudy “False Accuser” Miller works for the Jackson County Attorney’s office. Without these key pieces of evidence it will be impossible for me to be prepared for any contested omnibus hearing.
I know that your fake prosecutor was dead set on having me “lynched”56,57,58 at the last sham hearing. Which is why your fake prosecutor is still illegally withholding the key evidence from me. It is logical to conclude that your fake prosecutor is counting on you to aid and abet her in that criminal act. Just like it is logical to conclude that your fake prosecutor is counting on you to ignore the fact that is a criminal act59,60 for your fake prosecutor to illegally access my private data and my 13.82 confidential subdivision 7 criminal investigative data without a signed authorization. Unfortunately for you that specific instance is clearly spelled out in the Jackson County Attorney’s Office Brady policy as: “misconduct that involves the inappropriate or unauthorized use of government data.” By the way, that is the policy that your fake prosecutor said that she agreed to follow.
So again I am demanding the immediate dismissal of this sham complaint!
I hope you noticed that a copy is being sent to your boss Minnesota State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba

04/11/2026

Darci “Kangaroo Court” Benz, Biased, Activist judicial officer 04-10-26
Re: Fake Prosecutor Calls For Allen’s “Lynching” At Sham Hearing – Demand For Dismissal For Illegally Withholding Impeachment Evidence At 32-CR-25-111 Sham
Let’s make something perfectly clear: You and your corrupt officers of your Kangaroo court are the aggressors.1 See Exhibits A & B. I am the victim2 of your aggression. I am simply defending myself against your false accusations, your violations of my rights and your mischaracterizations3 of the facts. Clearly, you are upset that I am a fighter and not a complaint sheep who blindly follows an unsuspecting herd to the slaughter. Who is their right mind would trust you? Certainly not me! FYI: EITHER EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE RULES OR NO ONE FOLLOWS THE RULES! Get that straight in your head!
You have repeatedly proven to me that you willfully refuse to protect my rights4 in this sham of a case. Just like you have repeatedly proven to me that you willfully refuse to make your fake prosecutor Maryellen “Lynch5 Mob Ringleader” Suhrhoff follow the law and the rules of the Kangaroo court. A prime example of that is your willful refusal to rule on whether or not your fake prosecutor “Lynch Mob6,7 Ringleader” Suhrhoff illegally accessed my private data or submitted a fraudulent bill to the Jackson County Treasurer when she did not have a signed contract to prosecute on 07-25-25. I don’t know about you but that sounds like both evidence of criminal activity and probable cause to me. So you aren’t going to be upset when I report that to law enforcement? Oh wait! You are supposed to report8 your officers of your Kangaroo court to law enforcement when there is credible evidence of criminal activity, aren’t you? See Exhibit C.
And a rights violation10 occurred when you knowingly, intentionally and maliciously weaponized9 the official court record. Falsely accusing11,12,13 me of irrational and illogical behavior on the official court record is a defamatory smear on my good name and on my reputation. You and your corrupt Kangaroo court earned the labels14 that I assigned to you based on my observations15 and my identifying16 the instances when and where my rights were violated. If you or your officers of the Kangaroo court are going to think and act like you are above the law, then don’t complain when the appropriate labels are attached.
One of your re****ed one-sided rules17 is “You must: • Be fully prepared for the remote hearing.” I was fully prepared for you to rule on my Demand for Dismissal that you and your corrupt Jackson County Attorney Kristi “Suborns Perjury”18,19,20 Meyeraan have had in your possession21,22 since 12-29-25. But, instead I was falsely accused23 of filing paperwork into your Kangaroo court on 04-07-26. I do know that I personally hand-delivered a complimentary copy of paperwork for rigged case 32-CR-26-19 State of Minnesota vs Brian Arlin Wendelsdorf on 03-23-26 to your corrupt Court Administrator Kayla McKinney that as of today’s date is still not filed24 into the Register of Actions. Obviously, denying Brian his right to access to your Kangaroo court is a top priority for you, Michael “Kangaroo court” Trushenski and Assistant Chief Judicial officer Troy “Kangaroo court” Timmerman.
You do remember that you have repeatedly lied on the weaponized record for fake prosecutor “Lynch Mob Ringleader” Suhrhoff about not being in possession25,26 of my Demand for Dismissal, don’t you? You wanted to run interference27,28 for her on the weaponized record so

04/05/2026

04/03/2026

FRONT PAGE STORY ON LOCAL CORRUPTION THAT INVOLVES THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERRIF.

03/23/2026

Friday, March 20, 2026 – First visit to City Attorney Bradley Anderson’s office
Secretary: Hi! [Doorbell continues to ring]
Amy Allen: Hi there. We are here. Is Bradley Anderson around?
Secretary: He is. But, he is in another documents. What ...
Amy Allen: Okay. Amy Allen and Brian Wendelsdorf. In regards to some evidence he is withholding from 32-CR-26-19
Secretary: What do mean withholding?
Amy Allen: Um can we speak with him?
Secretary: I’ll see ...
Amy Allen: Okay.
Secretary: ... if he is available. [Doorbell continues to ring] [long pause as secretary leaves speaks with Anderson] You can just have a seat.
Amy Allen: Thank you.
Secretary: It’ll be just a couple of minutes.
Amy Allen: All right.
Secretary: He’s got to finish. [Doorbell continues to ring]
Amy Allen: Sounds good.
Secretary: He’s kind of in the middle of
Amy Allen: Thank you.
Secretary: The doorbell is going to keep ringing.
Amy Allen: Oh.
Secretary: Even if you breath.
Amy Allen: Oh.
Secretary: So I’m just going to just going to [unintelligible]
Brian Wendelsdorf: [Laughs]
Amy Allen: Thank you.
Brian Wendelsdorf: [whispers]
Amy Allen: You can shut it off now.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Mr. Wendelsdorf?
Brian Wendelsdorf: Yup.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Are you represented by counsel?
Brian Wendelsdorf: No. I just brought a friend with me. [unintelligible]
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Okay.
Amy Allen: 2:24 We are looking for that evidence he requested to Sheriff Haken
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: I got no request. I got nothin’.
Amy Allen: You have an email that was received to you? Okay? So we’re here to look for that evidence.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: 2:36 You should check your emails. My email address is not the one you have been using. I don’t know where you got it from. But [unintelligible] 2:43
Amy Allen: Okay that’s fine. But, we’re here to get that evidence that has been requested to Sheriff Haken in regard to the evidence of the recordings.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: He’s working on that.
Amy Allen: He is working on that? When will that be received to us. Because you have a hearing on Monday.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: I don’t know. It won’t be by Monday. Um, I got about half of it I think so far. So, if you got anything formal I think under the circumstance that we should bring it up in open court. To make sure there is a full and complete record of it. Okay?
Amy Allen: Brian needs to have that before Monday.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: It won’t happen.

Amy Allen: It won’t happen.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: There’s a lot that they have to uh transcribe.
Amy Allen: I see. But he is working on that?
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Yep.
Amy Allen: You’re not withholding evidence?
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Nope. In fact, if you would make a request for ah disclosure I would. In fact, I’ll accept this as your request for disclosure. I’ll send you all the evidence that I have in my file. And treat it like a Rule 7 request. Okay?
Brian Wendelsdorf: Okay.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: And everything else we should put before the court.
Amy Allen: All right. So ...
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Okay?
Amy Allen: ... he’s working on that. So he’s not perjurying himself? By all means. Then on evidence. Case number 32-CR-26-19 that we’ve given sheriff Haken ah a clear email in regards to getting that to us before Monday. But he’s working on that per you, correct?
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Yep.
Amy Allen: Okay. Thank you for your time, sir. Thank you.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Um. Why don’t you take this. [Business cards distributed] This has my correct email address on it. So you send it to the right place.
Amy Allen: Very good.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Okay?
Amy Allen: Thank you.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: Thank you
Amy Allen: Mmmhmm.
Secretary: Watch your step out.
Amy Allen: Watch your step.
Secretary: I tell everybody.
Amy Allen: Thank you. 00:19- 4:26/4:31 20260320_132723.mp4 03-20-26 video taken by Brian Wendelsdorf
exculpatory evidence (ek-sk

Copyright ©2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. The...

03/23/2026

Evidence Of City Of Jackson City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson Destroying Evidence
Exhibit D is a Chapter 13.04 Subject Data Request submitted on Monday, March 16 at 9:20 PM to Jackson County Sheriff Shawn Haken. Yet in the Friday, March 20th videos Anderson claims: “ I got no request. I got nothin’.” It defies logic and reason that Sheriff Haken wouldn’t send the Chapter 13.04 Subject Data Request to the prosecutor assigned to 32-CR-26-19 State of Minnesota vs Brian Arlin Wendelsdorf. Plus, it defies logic and reason, that Anderson has no idea that Brian has previously submitted a Chapter 13.04 Subject data Request. The previous Data Request is filed into the Register of Actions for 32-CR-26-19.
Haken’s perjured complaint is filled with mischaracterizations 6 and defamatory7 statements. Haken’s perjured complaint is Haken’s weapon in his smear campaign against me for me daring to report8 a suspected drug house9,10 on my street. If corrupt Haken wants to aid and abet drug dealers, then he shouldn’t expect glowing praise 11,12,13. Page 1. 02/23/2026 February 23, 2026 Notice to Remove Judicial Officer Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Party: Defendant WENDELSDORF, BRIAN ARLIN Index #3 83 pages. Case Number: 32-CR-26-19 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs BRIAN ARLIN WENDELSDORF Case Type: Crim/Traf Mandatory Date Filed: 01/30/2026 Case Location: Jackson County Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Case Status: Open. https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/CaseSearch
The most damning piece of evidence of this conspiracy is that fact my evidence for this malicious prosecution is being illegally withheld 17,18,19,20 from me. On Sunday, February 8, 2026 at 1:43 PM I emailed a Chapter 13.04 Subject Data Request/Discovery Request to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. I requested that the the (66) audio files that Haken has claimed to have personally listened to be emailed or file shared to me. (See Exhibit A) Page 1. 02/23/2026 February 23, 2026 Notice to Remove Judicial Officer Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Party: Defendant WENDELSDORF, BRIAN ARLIN Index #3 83 pages. Case Number: 32-CR-26-19 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs BRIAN ARLIN WENDELSDORF Case Type: Crim/Traf Mandatory Date Filed: 01/30/2026 Case Location: Jackson County Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Case Status: Open. https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/CaseSearch
Chapter 13.03 And Chapter 13.04 Subject Data Request For Brian Wendelsdorf And Release Of 13.04 Data To Amy Alien Sun, Feb 8, 2026 at 1:43 PM Exhibit A. Page 8. 02/23/2026 February 23, 2026 Notice to Remove Judicial Officer Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Party: Defendant WENDELSDORF, BRIAN ARLIN Index #3 83 pages. Case Number: 32-CR-26-19 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs BRIAN ARLIN WENDELSDORF Case Type: Crim/Traf Mandatory Date Filed: 01/30/2026 Case Location: Jackson County Judicial Officer: Bentz, Darci J. Case Status: Open. https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/CaseSearch

Evidence Of City Of Jackson City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson Destroying Evidence
Exhibit C is proof that Jackson City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson made the conscious decision to not provide Brian with his evidence on Tuesday, March 10th. Remember that according to the legal definition of possession, Anderson was in control of all the evidence for 32-CR-26-19 on that day. And even though Anderson was in control of the evidence for 32- CR-26-19 he willfully refuse to provide Brian with his evidence.
“We have held that when the State suppresses or fails to disclose material exculpatory evidence, the good or bad faith of the prosecution is irrelevant: a due process violation occurs whenever such evidence is withheld.” Illinois v. Fisher.2 2. 540 U.S. 544, 547, 124 S.Ct. 1200, 1202 (2004). George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 145.
Spoliation n. (18c) 1. The intentional destruction, mutilation, alteration, or concealment of evidence, usu. A document. If proved, spoliation may be used to establish that the evidence was unfavorable to the party responsible. Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Ed. Page 1531.
adverse inference. A detrimental conclusion drawn by the fact-finder from a party's failure to produce evidence that is within the party's control – Some courts allow the inference only if the party's failure is attributable to bad faith. - Also termed adverse presumption. Cf. SPOLIATION (1). Pages 847-848. Blac

Case Search allows you to search for a court case and view the Case Details (Register of Actions) with case information and public documents for the case.

03/23/2026

Evidence Of City Of Jackson City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson Destroying Evidence
Below is a business card obtained from the law offices of Bradley W. Anderson on Friday, March 20, 2026. The business card indicates that the email address for Bradley W. Anderson is “[email protected].”
Anderson was caught on video lying about not knowing where the email address "[email protected]” came from. Plus, Anderson was caught lying about the March 19th email not being in his possession. It is logical to conclude that a member of the city council or a member of the City staff forwarded him the email. (See Exhbits A & B) Anderson knew the contents of the email and the email address used on Friday, March 20th when confronted by Wendelsdorf & Allen.
City Attorney Bradley W. Anderson: You should check your emails. My email address is not the one you have been using. I don’t know where you got it from. But [unintelligible] 2:36- 2:43/4:31 20260320_132723.mp4 03-20-26 video taken by Brian Wendelsdorf
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/pr/subtype/cond/id/8.4/ PROFESSIONAL RULES Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.4Misconduct It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;

03/13/2026

HOW THE CORRUPT JACKSON COUNTY KANGAROO COURT HARASSED AMY ALLEN Jan 21,22,and 23.

Amy Allen.
Jan 21, hearing held 11 am.
Requested transcripts at the hearing.
Judge Benze said to stop at admin office to complete my request.

I was given application and was ONE SHEET as I looked over to make sure it was thorough , I asked receptionist if it was done correctly and if anything else was needed as I handed directly to her.
It was ONE SHEET ONLY. Where I wrote my name at top of the page where directed to place your name.

Jan 22, 4:26 pm.
I started towards the direction of the admin office where I had zoom meeting which was the admin office , and same receptionist was walking down stairs in outdoor attire as to finish her work day.
I asked where I go for Kayla, Mckinnly office administrator,
With no longer a welcoming smile as directed on the 21, and a cold rudeness about her,
The receptionist Directed me to two floors down to basement.

THE SAME RUDE HOSTILE RECEPTIONIST THAT GAVE ONE FORM WRONGFULLY AND SENT ME TO THE BASEMENT WRONGFULLY.

It was there where it was not admin office , however Kristie Myeranne dungeon in bottom floor was convenient for my second task.. to serve and complete task number two of to deliver stack of paper on Benz k court. It was handed to the receptionist.
It was 4 29 pm and all was closed up for the day.

Jan 23 after 1 pm,
I went to the admin office where a different lady took my paper work to serve Kayla M , when the receptionist asked of my name, she recognized my name and brought to attention that I did not sign with signature nor mark a box for reason for the transcript REQUEST. ( on the 21, I had written in reason rather than mark a box that did not apply.
A SECOND SHEET WAS NEEDED TO BE FILLED OUT.
IN WHICH WAS NOT GIVEN ORIGINALLY ON DAY ONE BY THE

I filled out and marked box for reason as “ personal Use” and signed my name.
The receptionist accepted my second request.

I asked if I could have transcript now, and she said there is a process it would go thru and the recorder would contact me when ready.

That is what I know to be True.

03/13/2026

HOW THE CORRUPT JACKSON COUNTY KANGEROO COURT HARASSED AMY AND BRIAN.
HOW THE CORRUPT JACKSON COUNTY KANGEROO COURT HARASSED AMY AND BRIAN.

March 11, Brian Wendelsdorf and myself, Amy Allen entered admin office with a smile and gave a pleasant good morning with a smile.
Brian stated that he would like a trancript from his hearing and handed a note with case number, when she asked for detail.
We requested a informa pauperus, she pointed to the computer next to us and stated that we would have to log on and print out the forms ourselves.
She also corrected the term informa pauperous and said “ we call it a fee waver form”.

I asked if any were readily available and if she could help us, she rolled her eyes and smacked her lips and walked away to sit at desk and call someone with very soft voice and we stood there for 25 MINUTES.
No apologies were given by her for the long wait.

She handed us papers and a telephone number that we would have to call the court reporter in Fairmont to find out what she charges for transcript.
When handed the fee waver paper work she had Punch glued ( staple-less) the sheets in three separate sections and were glued all out of sorts. Not in order.

Brian and I went out to truck to figure out the forms and when brought in filled out and handed to her. She took them and I asked if she would please look over to assure it was done correctly, she gave back sheets and said it was not needed and took only 2 SHEETS.

She said that was all that was needed and sent us off with her approval of done correctly.
It was not accepted as done correctly, notice given on next day, March 12,2026.

There are 6 pages that I see that are needed that we will do over and take to court house today.