Inday Marie Vlog

05/09/2026

05/09/2026

Malacañang says President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. had no power over the Sandiganbayan’s decision to remove former Public Works Secretary Manuel Bonoan from the graft and plunder case.

P**ANG INANG GOBYERNO ANG MAGNANAKAW NASA LAYA AT PINAWAWALANG SALA. HABANG ANG MGA NAKIKIPAGLABAN AY PINAKUKULONG INUUBOS ANG MINORITY AT ANG MGA SUPPORTERS TINATAKOT. SANDIGANG BAYAN WALA NA RING MAASAHAN ANG TAONG BAYAN SA INYO IBIG AABIHIN ANG KORTE AY WALA NG KATARUNGAN NA MAAASAHAN PA.

KILOS NA MGA KABAYAN PARA SA TUNAY NA PAGBABAGO. PABABAYAAN NA LANG BA NATIN NA YURAKAN NILA TAYO AT SILA NA LANG ANG MABUHAY?! KAPAG KAPANALIG KA NG ADMINISTRATION BUHAY KA MAY PERA KA PA 🤣🤣🤣 KAPAG KALABAN KA KULONG KA AT NAGDURUSA KA NG WALANG KALABAN LABAN. NO MORE MARCOS IN THE FUTURE. IPAHLABAN ANG CONSTITUTION AT ANG BAYAN NATING SINILANGAN. HINDI NA ITO MAKATARUNGAN. HARAP HARAPANG PAGNANAKAW AT PANLOLOKO SA ATING LAHAT. 😡😡😡

05/09/2026

NAKAKA P**ANG INA TALAGA ANG GOBYERNONG ITO. CONGRESISTA, SENATORS, NGAYON PATI ANG MGA JUDGES AY KITA NG KITA NA HAWAK NILA SA LEEG PARA SUMUNOD. MALETANG PERA IKAW ANG DIYOS NILA. WALANG PAKIALAMAN KAHIT NA WALANG BASEHAN. ANG ELEMENT NG GRAVE THREAT IS NOT JUST MOUNTH KUNDI MAY PAGTATANGKA NG MALAPITAN AT ANG ELEMENTO NG PAGGAMIT NG PONDO AY WALANG NAPATUNAYAN. LAHAT AY SADYANG HAKAHAKA AT PAGBIBINTANG. JUDGE ANONG NANGYARI SA ELEMENTO NG GRAVE THREAT BAKIT PUMASOK?! P**A NAMAN TAONG BAYAN NA NGA ANG NAKAKAKITA NG LAHAT NG PANLOLOKO NG MGA POLITICAL ENEMY NG MGA DUTERTE PEEO SUMAMA KA PA?! JUDGE NAGBABASE KAYO SA MGA ELEMENT NG CRIME HINDI SA SALITA ANONG NANGYARI???? MADAM JUDGE MARIA ANGELICA DE RAMOS 😡😡😡😡

SADYANG WALA NG KATARUNGAN ANG BANSAG ITO AT WALA NANG SINUSUNOD NA XONSTITUTION. DI PA KAYO MAMATAY LAHAT NG MAGING MAAYOS NAMAN ANG KAWAWANG BANSANG PILIPINAS DAHIL SA INYO.

28/08/2026

HOY GAGONG TULFO! PARANG PINALALABAS MO AGAD NA MAY KASALANAN SI VO SARA.

WAG MONG GAMITIN NAGBSALITANG TAONG BAYAN DAHIL IKAW MISMO GINAMIT MO ANG MGA MAHIHIRAP PARA MAKARATING KA SA PWESTONG YAN AT ANG BUONG OAMILYANMO!!! NGAYON WALA KA NGANG MATULUNGAN DAHIL TUTA KA NI PBBM KAYA PURO ENDORSEMENT KA NA LANG GUNGGONG!!!

21/08/2026

PERJURY CASE #2: Kaso Laban sa Kasinungalingan - O Laban sa Testimonya?

⸻

Here’s the part people should understand: Vice President Sara Duterte’s second perjury complaint against Ramil Madriaga does NOT, by itself, prove that Madriaga lied. At hindi rin nito magically binubura ang kanyang testimony sa impeachment proceedings. A complaint is an accusation. Evidence still has to do the heavy lifting.

Noong March 4, Sara Duterte filed her first perjury complaint against Madriaga after he accused her of involvement in questionable cash deliveries and campaign funding. Then on August 17, she personally filed a second perjury complaint before the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office, this time attacking allegedly false statements in Madriaga’s April supplemental affidavit. Her camp says the filing runs to around 1,000 pages, with Duterte’s sworn testimony, statements from 12 witnesses, official documents, messages, photos and other records.

Pero tandaan natin:

1,000 pages is a measurement of paper, not automatically a measurement of truth.

Hindi porke makapal ang complaint, manipis na agad ang credibility ng witness.

And Madriaga is not some irrelevant side character in this political drama. He claims he once worked for the Dutertes and served as a “bagman.” During the House impeachment hearings, he alleged that the ₱125-million OVP confidential fund was actually disposed of in less than 24 hours, describing four large bags of cash and alleged deliveries to several recipients. Duterte has categorically denied knowing him and denies his accusations.

Madriaga’s credibility absolutely deserves scrutiny. He is currently detained and facing a kidnapping-for-ransom case, which the defense can—and surely will - use to challenge him.

But credibility is tested by cross-examination, corroboration and evidence - not by counting how many cases have been filed against the witness.

And this is where the story gets interesting.

Madriaga’s lawyers did not run away from the second complaint. They welcomed it. Their position is essentially: bring the accusations to the proper forum and test them. They said their client is prepared to answer using “actual, competent, and independently verifiable evidence,” stressing that a complaint—whether 10 pages or 1,000—does not establish guilt.

At dito dapat maging very careful ang publiko.

Sara Duterte has every right to defend herself. If Madriaga deliberately lied under oath, then prosecute him and prove it.

But Madriaga also has the right to present his evidence.

Hindi puwedeng ang public narrative ay:

May perjury complaint = sinungaling na ang witness = tapos na ang usapan.

That is not how evidence works.

Otherwise, napakadaling formula niyan:

May whistleblower? File-an ng kaso.
May damaging witness? File-an ulit.
May bagong affidavit? Another complaint.
Then announce: “Sinungaling siya!”

But accusations against the accuser are still accusations.

The real question remains unanswered:

CAN HIS CLAIMS BE INDEPENDENTLY CORROBORATED?

Because if Madriaga is lying, evidence should destroy his story.

But if documents, bank records, witnesses, cash-withdrawal records or other independent evidence begin matching significant portions of his account, then no amount of dramatic legal paperwork can make those facts disappear.

That is why the impeachment court should not be distracted by who filed more cases against whom.

Follow the money.
Follow the documents.
Follow the witnesses.
Follow the contradictions.
And let both sides undergo the same brutal test of evidence.

Because the Filipino people are not asking:

“Sino ang mas magaling mag-file ng complaint?”

We are asking:

“SAAN NAPUNTA ANG PERA?”

At kung nagsisinungaling si Madriaga, expose him.

But kung nagsasabi siya ng totoo?

Then filing Perjury Case #2 will not erase the truth. It will only give the truth another courtroom in which to prove itself.

Hindi nasusukat ang katotohanan sa kapal ng complaint.
Nasusukat ito sa bigat ng ebidensya.

And in an impeachment involving public money, the Filipino people deserve receipts - not intimidation, not theatrics, and definitely not shortcuts to the truth.

⸻

📚 SOURCES:

- PhilStar: Sara Duterte files another perjury complaint vs Ramil Madriaga (Aug 17, 2026)
🔗 https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/08/17/2549911/sara-duterte-files-another-perjury-complaint-vs-ramil-madriaga?

- Inquirer: Sara Duterte files another perjury case vs Madriaga (Aug 18, 2026)
🔗 https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2286768/sara-duterte-files-another-perjury-rap-vs-madriaga

- Daily Tribune: Madriaga camp: Perjury case offers chance to defend claims (Aug 18, 2026)
🔗 https://tribune.net.ph/2026/08/18/madriaga-camp-perjury-case-offers-chance-to-defend-claims

⸻

21/08/2026

The Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption has renewed its push to reinstate the death penalty for individuals convicted of plunder, as allegations of massive corruption involving public funds remain under government scrutiny.

VACC President Arsenio “Boy” Evangelista said during a July forum that large-scale theft of public funds should be classified as economic sabotage, arguing that corruption deprives Filipinos of essential services and damages the economy. He said imposing tougher penalties could discourage public officials from engaging in plunder.

The call came amid the ongoing flood-control corruption scandal, which has triggered complaints and investigations involving current and former government officials. Evangelista also raised concerns over possible attempts to keep the controversy from reaching the courts and called for accountability beyond former Ako Bicol representative Zaldy Co.

The VACC made the call weeks before the latest Habagat flooding, which has once again put flood-control infrastructure under the microscope, as billions of pesos allocated for such projects remain at the heart of corruption investigations.

Among those facing investigation is former House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The Office of the Ombudsman ordered Romualdez and other respondents to respond to allegations of plunder, graft, direct and indirect bribery, and money laundering involving a flood-control scheme and approximately ₱56 billion in purported ill-gotten wealth accumulated from 2022 to 2025. The Ombudsman has identified Romualdez as the mastermind of the scheme.

Under the Anti-Plunder Law, a public official who amasses at least ₱50 million in ill-gotten wealth through a combination or series of specified criminal acts may face a plunder charge. While the law previously permitted the death penalty, capital punishment has been barred since Republic Act No. 9346 took effect in 2006.

Reinstating the death penalty would require Congress to pass new legislation. Senate Bill No. 1343, filed by Sen. Ronald "Bato" Dela Rosa in September 2025 and co-authored by Sen. B**g Go, seeks to restore capital punishment specifically for plunder. The bill remains pending in committee.

In January 2025, a separate measure was filed in the House seeking to impose the death penalty by firing squad on public officials convicted of corruption, malversation of public funds and plunder.

21/08/2026

VP SARA, HINAMON ANG PALASYO: ILABAS DIN ANG TRAVEL EXPENSES AT PUBLIC FUNDS NI MARCOS JUNIOR

Hindi lang umano Office of the Vice President ang dapat singilin sa transparency.

Ito ang punto ni Vice President Sara Duterte matapos niyang hamunin ang Malacañang na isapubliko rin ang mga travel authority, kaukulang gastusin sa biyahe, at public funds na ginagamit ng mga opisyal at empleyadong pinahihintulutang bumiyahe ng Palasyo.

“Transparency and accountability should not be demanded from a single government office alone,” pahayag ni VP Sara nitong Agosto 18.

Ayon sa Bise Presidente, ang Office of the President ang nag-iisyu ng travel authority sa maraming tanggapan at maging sa sarili nitong mga opisyal at empleyado, kaya nararapat lamang umanong malaman ng publiko kung magkano rin ang ginagastos sa kanilang mga biyahe.

“The public would surely appreciate full information on the travel expenses incurred by these offices and officials, including the public funds used for such trips,” .

Direkta rin niyang hiniling na gawing available sa publiko ang mga dokumentong kaugnay ng mga naturang biyahe.

“From hereon, we expect that all travel authorities issued by the Palace, together with the corresponding travel expenses and public funds involved, be made available to the public,” dagdag niya.

Ang pahayag ni VP Sara ay kasunod ng pagkuwestiyon ng Malacañang sa milyon-milyong pisong gastos para sa seguridad ng OVP personnel sa kanilang foreign trips.

Sa madaling sabi, ang hamon ng Bise Presidente sa Palasyo: kung ilalabas ang gastos ng OVP, ilabas din ang gastos sa mga biyaheng inaprubahan ng Malacañang.

20/08/2026

KUNWARI KA PA ANTI CLAIRE KAYO MAY KAGAGAWAN NYAN PARA BUMALIKTAD SI GUTEZA AT SIGURADO KAMI NA TINAKOT AT BINAYARAN NUO YAN PARA MALIGTAS SI ROMUALDEZ. 😡😡😡😡

MATAGAL NYO NA KAMING NILOLOKO MULA NG UMUPO YANG SI BBM NA MAGNANAKAW NG PONDO NG BAYAN.