08/04/2026
âJust get on and rideâ is not always the answer.
Iâm going to say something that seems to offend people far more than it shouldâŚ
Not every horse needs to be ridden. And more importantly, not every horse is ready to be ridden.
Iâm seeing far too many situations where the answer is still âjust get on and ride,â even when the horse is clearly lacking strength, unable to lift through the back, or showing behavioural signs that something isnât right. Riding is being treated as the solution, when in many cases it simply isnât.
If a horse cannot organise its body without a rider, what exactly do we think happens when we add weight on top? The compensation doesnât disappear, it gets reinforced. The tension doesnât resolve, it either gets masked or it escalates.
This is often where people start to notice problems under saddle. The canter feels difficult, the horse feels heavy, thereâs resistance, or behaviour begins to show up more clearly. But these arenât isolated issues. Theyâre signs that the horse doesnât yet have the strength or coordination to carry whatâs being asked of it.
Strength, coordination, and correct function have to come first. And yes, a huge amount of that can be developed from the ground. That doesnât make it less valuable, and it certainly doesnât make it wrong. In many cases, itâs the most appropriate place to start.
What I find frustrating is not that people choose to ride, but that others feel the need to question or criticise those who donât. If someone chooses to take the time to build their horse properly, to listen, and to develop strength before adding load, why is that controversial?
You donât need to justify groundwork. You donât need to rush back into the saddle. And you certainly donât need to follow advice that ignores what the horse in front of you is telling you.
Because at the end of the day, this isnât about what we want to do. Itâs about what the horse is actually capable of doing comfortably, correctly, and without compensation.