05/09/2026
THOUGHT FROM MY 1-2-1 WORK — AND A SUBJECT WE TOUCHED ON AT DOG SUNDAY SCHOOL
I briefly touched on the subject of training equipment during Thursday's initial Dog Sunday School induction and theory lesson.
It was only a brief introduction, but it is something that comes up regularly in my 1-2-1 work too, particularly when I'm working with dogs that have developed a strong history of pulling on the lead.
And it prompted me to revisit something I've seen repeatedly over the years.
Sometimes changing the equipment isn't about finding a better tool.
It's about creating a better starting point.
THE SEMANTICS OF SAFETY: SOMETIMES A CHANGE OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES EVERYTHING
In modern dog training, equipment can become surprisingly ideological.
Harnesses are often presented as the universally safer or more humane option, while collars can be portrayed as inherently uncomfortable or even harmful.
But perhaps we're asking the wrong question.
The more useful question is:
What is the equipment helping the dog and handler to learn?
Equipment doesn't train a dog.
But it can influence how easily we can communicate, how the dog responds to pressure, and whether existing patterns of behaviour are being continually rehearsed.
And sometimes, simply changing the equipment can provide something incredibly useful:
A clean slate.
WHEN THE EQUIPMENT HAS BECOME PART OF THE PROBLEM
Consider a dog that has spent months pulling into a harness.
The dog pulls.
The harness provides comfortable resistance.
The dog continues towards whatever it wants — a scent, another dog, a person, somewhere interesting.
The behaviour has a history.
It has been rehearsed repeatedly.
That doesn't mean the harness has somehow "taught" the dog to pull. Nor does it mean every harness causes pulling.
But it can mean that the equipment has become part of the context and cueing system surrounding that behaviour.
The dog may not consciously "decide" to pull each time. After sufficient repetition, the appearance of the equipment and the familiar sequence surrounding the walk can become powerful predictors of what comes next.
The response can therefore become highly practised, strongly cued and remarkably automatic-looking.
Simply continuing to use exactly the same arrangement while expecting a completely different response isn't always the best or easiest place to begin.
SOMETIMES A FLAT COLLAR PROVIDES A FRESH STARTING POINT
A well-fitted flat collar can offer a remarkably useful alternative.
Particularly when the dog has no previous history with that particular collar, we can introduce it as part of a completely new learning experience.
The aim isn't to make the collar uncomfortable.
It isn't to use it as a punishment.
And it certainly isn't to rely upon the collar to "stop" pulling.
Instead, it allows us to introduce some very basic principles of lead handling and communication from a new beginning.
The dog learns that subtle changes in the lead can have meaning.
The handler learns how to handle the lead rather than simply hold onto it.
Desired behaviour is recognised, rewarded and reinforced.
Unwanted behaviour is dealt with calmly and proportionately when necessary.
And, perhaps most importantly, the owner begins to learn what they are doing, when they are doing it and why.
THE EQUIPMENT ISN'T THE ANSWER
This is where I think many discussions about dog-training equipment go wrong.
There is an overwhelming temptation to believe that finding the "right" piece of equipment will solve the problem.
It won't.
A harness won't teach a dog to pull.
A flat collar won't teach a dog to walk nicely.
Neither piece of equipment possesses the ability to train a dog.
The handler does.
The equipment simply forms part of the communication between them.
A change of equipment can very often make that communication easier — particularly when it breaks an established pattern and allows us to start teaching something different.
THE REAL TRANSFORMATION IS OFTEN THE HANDLER
In many cases, the initial change can produce surprisingly quick results.
But that certainly isn't the end of the process.
It is actually only the beginning.
The dog may already have demonstrated that they can behave differently. The next challenge is helping the owner consistently reproduce that result without relying upon the trainer being there.
That's where coaching becomes so important.
Learning how to recognise the right moment.
Learning how to respond before a situation escalates.
Learning how much lead to give.
Learning when to reinforce.
Learning when to intervene.
Learning how to make the desired behaviour easier for the dog to choose.
And gradually turning those new responses into everyday habits.
THERE IS NO MAGIC PIECE OF EQUIPMENT
I've worked with enough dogs to know that changing equipment can sometimes produce an impressive initial difference.
I've also seen dogs wearing exactly the same equipment behave completely differently depending upon who is holding the other end of the lead.
That's an important lesson.
The equipment matters.
But the relationship between the equipment, the dog and the handler matters far more.
This is why I don't believe in prescribing one piece of equipment for every dog.
Sometimes a harness is entirely appropriate.
Sometimes a well-fitted flat collar is the better choice.
Sometimes something else may be appropriate.
The point isn't that one piece of equipment is universally "good" and another universally "bad".
Nor should we assume that a harness is automatically safer simply because it is a harness, any more than we should assume that a collar is automatically dangerous simply because it is a collar.
A collar is hardly some specialist or inherently aversive piece of training equipment. For dogs being taken into public places, it is also a normal part of responsible ownership, with the Control of Dogs Order 1992 requiring dogs in public places or on a highway to wear a collar bearing the owner's name and address, subject to certain exemptions.
The more useful questions are:
Can the dog move comfortably?
Can the handler communicate clearly?
Can we teach the behaviour we actually want?
Can the equipment be used appropriately and responsibly for this particular dog?
The equipment should serve the training — not dictate it.
THE PRINCIPLE
For me, good training isn't about finding equipment that prevents a dog from doing something.
It's about creating the conditions in which the dog can learn what we would like them to do instead.
Sometimes that means changing the equipment.
Sometimes it means changing our technique.
Sometimes it means changing the way we think about the problem.
And very often, it means all three.
Because ultimately, the goal isn't simply a dog that doesn't pull on the lead.
It's a dog and handler who have learned how to move through the world together with greater understanding, communication and confidence.
Equipment doesn't train dogs.
People do.
And sometimes, changing the equipment is simply the first step towards teaching both of them how to do it better.