06/06/2026
Every few weeks I see another post from one of the numerous balanced trainers i am surrounded by suggesting that the divide in dog training is really just a disagreement between different opinions, different labels, or different philosophies.
I disagree.
For me, this isn't about politics or picking a side.
It's about WELFARE
Yes, dogs need guidance. Yes, dogs need consistency. Yes, dogs need clear communication.
Nobody is arguing otherwise.
What concerns me is how often words like balance, fairness, boundaries, and consequences are used to make aversive training sound reasonable without ever clearly discussing what those consequences actually involve.
Let's be honest, if we're confident in our methods, we shouldn't need vague language.
Behaviour science has repeatedly shown that dogs can be taught effectively using reward-based methods. At the same time, research has consistently linked aversive methods with increased stress, anxiety, fear, pessimistic emotional states, and potential fallout effects.
So the question I keep coming back to is,
If we can achieve the same training outcome without causing fear, pain, intimidation, or discomfort, why wouldn't we?
I often hear, "But every dog is different."
Of course they are.
Every dog is an individual.
But being an individual doesn't exempt a dog from the science of learning or the ethical responsibility we have as trainers.
The burden shouldn't be on force-free trainers to justify avoiding aversives.
The burden should be on those using aversives to explain why they are necessary.
Not why they work.
Many things work.
The question is whether they are needed when effective, lower-risk alternatives already exist.
For me, dog training isn't about finding a middle ground between reward-based training and aversive training.
It's about continually asking,
What is the most effective, least intrusive, least harmful way to help this dog learn?
Until someone can show me why fear, pain, intimidation, or coercion are necessary when humane alternatives are available, I'll continue to advocate for reward-based, evidence-led training.
Because dogs deserve more than what works.
They deserve what is ethical.