23/07/2026
🧠 𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 🚨
😞 It takes very little knowledge of learning theory to 𝕤𝕦𝕡𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤 behaviour.
🔻You don’t need to understand canine body language.
🔻You don’t need to understand emotions.
🔻You don’t need to understand motivation.
🔻You don’t need to know how dogs learn.
🔻 You certainly don’t care about welfare, or wellbeing.
And your certainly don’t need any qualifications for this 🫥
😒 All you need is to make the consequence unpleasant enough that the dog decides the behaviour isn’t worth repeating.
😖Pain.
🫣Fear.
🫤Discomfort.
🫨Intimidation.
These can 💯 suppress behaviour in almost any living creature. With enough of pain / discomfort/ fear / indicating you can force a living being into such withdrawal that … they stop doing anything at all.
That isn’t remarkable.
It’s simply how punishment works. Doh.
😱 Because suppression often produces an immediate, visible change, it can look incredibly effective.
A dog that was barking, pulling, growling or lunging suddenly stops. To an observer, it appears the problem has been “fixed.”
But the question we should really be asking is … has anything actually been taught? Or … what has my dog learnt ?
⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩⇩
🐶 Training should be about teaching.
Teaching means giving a dog new information, new skill set.
* What should I do instead?
* How do I earn reinforcement?
* How can I cope in this situation?
* How do I make better choices?
🤔 A dog cannot understand an alternative behaviour unless somebody actually teaches it. And teaching requires significant amount of skill, and knowledge.
⚠️ Simply stopping one behaviour does not automatically create another.
⚠️ Suppression will hide problems rather than solve them.
If the underlying cause is still there ➡️ fear, anxiety, frustration, pain, excitement or uncertainty, these causes remains unchanged, even if the outward behaviour disappears.
The absence of behaviour is not the absence of emotion.
🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻
Ask yourself this…
🙄 If a behaviour has genuinely been taught (as it should have been in training) …
Why must the dog continue wearing:
• a prong collar?
• an electronic collar?
• a head halter used for continual physical control?
• a slip lead requiring repeated leash corrections?
🐕 If the dog truly understands the skill, has practised it in many environments, and has been reinforced until it becomes reliable…
Shouldn’t the training eventually become independent of those tools?
Training aids do have legitimate uses in some contexts, but a teaching method should aim to reduce reliance on them, not require them indefinitely to maintain behaviour.
(。♥‿♥。)
🌱 Teaching creates understanding.
🫤Suppression creates avoidance.
🤗One builds confidence.
The other builds compliance through avoidance of more pain, more fear, more discomfort …
🚨They are not the same thing.
That is the difference between controlling behaviour… and truly teaching it.