The Philosophical Cowgirl

The Philosophical Cowgirl A new podcast where we’ll explore any areas horsemanship, philosophy, and even theology intersect. Hosted by a self-proclaimed redneck academic, Sarah Geis.

04/25/2026
The main reason I’m a Christian- An entirely unsolicited Easter weekend reflection:Jesus perfectly modeled the suffering...
04/04/2026

The main reason I’m a Christian- An entirely unsolicited Easter weekend reflection:

Jesus perfectly modeled the suffering servant prophesy written hundreds of years prior in Isaiah 53, which was about the sinless, suffering servant who came to die in the place of a sinful people. Throughout his ministry he had claimed to be God incarnate through accepting worship, having the authority to forgive sins, to heal people, and using Yahweh’s “I Am” statements as his own. All of these are either lies or insane, and completely blasphemous if they aren’t not true. He also prophesied that his own resurrection would happen three days after his death (Matt 16:21).

On Good Friday, he was crucified by those who knew very well how to kill people. He was buried by those who would have known what a dead person looked like. He was dead, not in a coma, not sleeping, but dead.

And if there was no resurrection, none of this matters. He should have simply faded from history as one more failed prophet or interesting (but delusional) teacher. If it didn’t happen, as Paul said, our faith is in vain (1 Corinthians 15:12-19).

But it did happen. His death was not just an average ex*****on. It was a total, conquering, and victorious one when he burst out of that grave. The resurrection showed that Jesus was precisely who he said he was.

There were 4 distinct sources written within the first generation of eyewitnesses- the Gospels- which are distinct enough from each other that they were not likely written in collusion, but remarkably still consistent with one another. These sources absolutely are not written like mythology or fan fiction stories. They go into extreme historical detail- even recounting uncomfortable facts for the time, such as women being the first to see the resurrected Jesus. These gospel accounts *cite their sources*, giving those readers alive during the first century a literal list of eyewitnesses to track down and ask. The gospels essentially beg their first century readers to VERIFY, not simply trust, the story. They name names (not just first names, but identifying details), places, times. That's not how revisionist history is written, and it's certainly not consistent with the tone or actions of manipulative cult leaders. These accounts are written begging us to look into the external, real-world facts of the story. It’s not a myth written to make us feel better about ourselves, it’s a true story anchored in history.

Jesus truly was God; only God could provide an infinite and perfect sacrifice for our sin against an infinite and perfect God, and his resurrection showed that God has fully certified Jesus’s life, ministry, and claims. Something spectacularly real was kicked off that resurrection Sunday.

🚨New podcast episode!Is the way we interpret texts like the Bible, the Consitution, and even literature like The Adventu...
03/25/2026

🚨New podcast episode!

Is the way we interpret texts like the Bible, the Consitution, and even literature like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn being undermined?

If you read anything- books, social media posts, news articles- or communicate in any capacity, you need to hear this.

I'm joined by Christian author, literary scholar, philosopher, pastor, and longtime professor Donald T. Williams about a dangerous shift in how people are taught to read today: from seeking authorial intention (originalism) to the reader-response view that readers create meaning, a stance he calls self-refuting and morally inconsistent with a “hermeneutical golden rule” of giving authors the same good-faith interpretive courtesy we expect for ourselves.

Some practical issues with this approach is that it:

-Undermines truth
-Fuels social-media chaos
-Affects interpretations of foundational texts like the Constitution and the Bible by transferring authority from text to reader.

This post-truth environment leads to other issues like media manipulation and reactivity against views we disagree with or find uncomfortable (Huck Finn as a racist book is discussed as an example). But Dr. Williams ultimately proposes better reading and understanding skills by caring about truth, close textual analysis rather than superficial reactivity.

You can get more on Dr. Williams' views on this topic in his book 95 Theses For A New Reformation (Amazon link here: https://a.co/d/01xXRmEK).

To check out the rest of Dr. William's work, check out his website at https://donaldtwilliams.com/

Ninety-Five Theses for a New Reformation: A Road Map for Post-Evangelical Christianity

New Podcast Episode! 📢🚨The Problem of Evil: Suffering, Faith, and the Search for Meaning with Dr. Douglas GroothuisWhy d...
03/17/2026

New Podcast Episode! 📢🚨

The Problem of Evil: Suffering, Faith, and the Search for Meaning with Dr. Douglas Groothuis

Why does a good God allow suffering?
It’s one of the oldest—and hardest—questions we can ask.

In this episode of The Philosophical Cowgirl, I sit down with philosopher and apologist Dr. Douglas Groothuis to explore the problem of evil from both an intellectual and deeply personal perspective.

Dr. Groothuis doesn’t just approach this topic academically—he has lived it. He shares reflections from his journey walking alongside his wife through early onset dementia, offering a perspective that is both philosophically rich and profoundly human.

Together, we discuss:
• Why the problem of evil is such a serious challenge
• Common responses (and where they fall short)
• The role of suffering in a Christian worldview
• How to think clearly—and honestly—about pain, loss, and faith

Whether you’re a believer, skeptic, or somewhere in between, this conversation invites you to wrestle with one of life’s deepest questions.

Link to episode in comments.

02/18/2026

Good vs bad philosophy part 2!

The goal of good philosophy is to find truth. Here’s how to tell whether or not someone is teaching with that in mind.

02/18/2026

Good vs Bad Philosophy Part 1:

Big words don’t equal wisdom.

If someone smart tears down your worldview without helping you rebuild, they’re not deep — they’re irresponsible.

01/30/2026

01/28/2026

📣NEW EPISODE ALERT! Out today on Spotify and Apple!

Here’s a preview. Link below! 👇👇👇

01/26/2026

The Dunning–Kruger effect is real:

When we know a little, we think we know a lot.
When we know more, we realize how much is left to learn.

That’s why curiosity and humility matter—and not just with horses.

Stay teachable. Stay humble. Stay growing. 🐴

Address

Larkspur, CO
80118

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Philosophical Cowgirl posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Philosophical Cowgirl:

Share

Category