09/03/2026
Leash Reactivity Mistake #3: Conflicting Goals (excerpt)
"Say a client has been taught that their dog should hold a heel position at their left side. Now we're out on a walk and working around triggers, and here comes another dog walking toward us, also passing on our left. Our dog does something we've been hoping for, it doesn't react. No stiffening, no fixating, no reaction whatsoever, which for a reactive dog is a genuine win. But in the process, its attention wavers and it drifts out of position.
And now the trainer is stuck. Do we reward this? Reward it and we're reinforcing a break in heel, undermining the very criteria we've spent weeks building. Don't reward it, or worse, correct it for the position break, and we're punishing or ignoring the exact moment we should be celebrating.
Either way, the trainer is losing the forest for the trees. Most of these clients didn't hire us because they want a dog with a flawless heel. They hired us, and paid us, because they want the lunging and barking to stop. The dog just handed us that, and we couldn't respond appropriately due to overlapping goals.
The problem becomes more significant when the dog breaks the obedience position to offer a genuinely prosocial response to the trigger. This could be the dog crossing from the handler's left side to the right side to create a bit more space. It could be as simple as the dog dropping its head to sniff, which can often be what's referred to as a cutoff signal, a way of saying "I see that, and I'm choosing not to engage with it." Both of these are instinctive, healthy, low-arousal ways of managing a moment that could otherwise escalate. However, I regularly watch trainers correct the dog for these choices or simply fail to reward them because they break the heel criteria, without ever recognizing what the dog was actually communicating.
In each of these cases, the dog isn't failing. It's doing the harder, more mature thing, entirely on its own. And we're not in a position to reinforce it, because we were working on two distinct goals at the same time, and in this moment those goals were conflicting with one another."
Read more. Link in comments.