29/05/2026
This is a brilliant article
Every where you go you hear dog owners saying “oh that dog is being dominant” or “my dog is being stubborn”
Unfortunately the Dominance theory has run and run on for years with many people still believing it. But what is never spoken about is the fact that the person who first did the experiment later on debunked the theory.
Dogs have all the same emotions as humans do. They feel fear, anxiety, happiness, excitement. But they are put into a world that doesn’t always aline with how they feel.
I firmly believe that teaching owners dog body language and breed specific needs is just as important, if not more important than just obedience training.
Because if you can understand and communicate with your dog better from the start a lot of the behaviour struggles lots of owners have would not manifest in the first place
One of the most damaging ideas ever introduced into the dog world is the belief that dogs are constantly trying to dominate each other and humans. The “dominance theory” model taught people to view behaviour through the lens of control, hierarchy, defiance, and power struggles. Growling became a challenge. Avoidance became manipulation. Reactivity became an attempt to “be alpha.” Instead of asking what a dog was experiencing emotionally or developmentally, the focus became how to suppress the behaviour and regain control.
The problem is that this theory was built on a misunderstanding from the very beginning.
Much of dominance theory came from early captive wolf studies, where unrelated wolves were placed together in artificial environments with limited space and resources. Under stress, conflict naturally emerged, and researchers interpreted these interactions through rigid hierarchical structures. But wild wolf families do not function like this. Modern wolf research has shown that wolf packs are primarily family units.
The “alpha wolf” idea itself was later rejected by the very researchers who originally popularised it.
Yet the dog world continued building entire training systems around outdated ideas of power and submission.
What is often missed is that dogs are not entering our homes trying to outrank us. They are mammals born into a nervous system that is seeking safety, connection, regulation, and belonging. Behaviour is not driven by a desire for dominance. It is driven by survival, emotion, genetics, developmental experiences, attachment, and the state of the nervous system.
This is where the work surrounding social characters becomes incredibly important.
At the Wolf and Dog Development Centre, the understanding of canine behaviour moves far beyond simplistic ideas of dominance. Their work explores the reality that dogs are born carrying innate social tendencies and emotional predispositions that would historically have served a purpose within a social group or survival structure. Not every dog is designed to move through the world in the same way. Some dogs are naturally orientated towards environmental awareness and scanning. Some are more socially driven and relationship-focused. Some are naturally cautious, investigative, nurturing, or highly responsive to movement and pressure.
These are not “bad traits.” They are social characteristics that, in a natural setting, would contribute to the survival and balance of the group.
When we misunderstand these traits through the lens of dominance, we pathologise normal canine behaviour. A vigilant dog becomes “controlling.” A sensitive dog becomes “stubborn.” A dog struggling with emotional regulation becomes “disobedient.” But often the dog is not trying to dominate anything at all. They are expressing an ingrained survival system colliding with an environment they cannot cope with.
This is one of the reasons punishment-based approaches can be so damaging. If behaviour is rooted in stress, fear, developmental conflict, or nervous system dysregulation, suppressing the outward behaviour does not resolve the internal state. In many cases, it simply drives the stress deeper into the system. The dog may appear “calm” while internally remaining overwhelmed, hypervigilant, or emotionally shut down.
The work of Shaun Ellis and Kim Ellis has also helped challenge many of the myths humans have projected onto wolves and dogs. Shaun Ellis became known for his immersive work living alongside wolves, seeing their communication, relationships, social structures, and behaviour in ways that differed dramatically from traditional dominance narratives. Rather than seeing constant aggression and battles for status, the picture that emerged was one of deep social cooperation, communication, emotional sensitivity, and role-based functioning within the group.
Their work highlights something the dog world still struggles to fully accept: social mammals survive through connection far more than conflict.
Wolves do not spend their lives attempting to overpower one another at every opportunity. Stable groups rely on trust, communication, and cooperative functioning. Young wolves are guided through development. Adults can adapt behaviour according to the needs of the group. Emotional signals matter. Social harmony matters. Relationships matter.
Dogs have inherited these deeply social mammalian systems, even though domestication has shaped them in unique ways over thousands of years.
This is why behaviour cannot be reduced to obedience alone.
A dog pulling on the lead doesn’t need “leadership.” A reactive dog doesn’t need harsher correction. A dog growling over food is not “challenging authority.” Often these dogs are communicating emotional conflict, insecurity, developmental deficits, chronic stress, or survival responses that humans have failed to understand.
The tragedy of dominance theory is that it taught generations of people to see communication as confrontation.
It encouraged owners to overpower signals instead of listening to them.
It framed trust based relationships as weakness.
And in doing so, it disconnected people from the emotional reality of the animal standing in front of them.
When we move beyond dominance theory, we begin to see dogs differently. We stop asking, “How do I control this dog?” and start asking, “What is this dog experiencing?” We begin looking at development, attachment, nervous system regulation, social needs, genetics, emotional safety, and relationship dynamics. We begin recognising that behaviour is not about winning power struggles. It is about understanding the mammal underneath the behaviour.
And perhaps most importantly, we stop forcing dogs into a constant battle for rank that never truly existed in the first place.
